A recent study of load profiles, rate structures and solar insolation for the three major California utilities underscores the beneficial match of PV generation and load demand.
Time of Use rates can stimulate faster adoption of PV systems that will offset peak demand.
Leveraging Time of Use rates, solar PV customers can benefit from higher economic returns and faster payback on their solar PV systems. The impact can be dramatic. Payback for PV system purchases can be reduced by 40% or more for California residents who select Time of Use pricing.
Time of Use Rates
Facilitated by smart meter adoption, Time of Use rates are being offered in many jurisdictions. In some cases like that in San Diego, there are even special Time of Use rates specifically for PV installations.
Where smart meters are deployed, Time of Use (TOU) rate structures soon follow. Time of Use pricing can have a positive impact on the economic returns for a PV System. Peak demand, and peak pricing, is highly coincident with solar PV system output.
A key utility benefit of TOU rates is matching the costs of electricity generation and transmission with its usage. TOU rates also provide the ratepayer (aka the utility ‘customer’) with an economic incentive to moderate electricity consumption during the peak demand periods.
Satisfying peak demand is expensive
Satisfying peak demand – especially during hot summer months – has long been a vexing challenge for utilities. Electrical systems must be designed for the peak requirements all the way from generation sources through to the extensive transmission and distribution infrastructure. When it comes to predicting load demands, weather plays a critical role. Hot summer afternoons drive demand for air conditioning which, in turn, drives the peak.
Hot weather, however, also reduces generation efficiency, lowers hydro reservoirs and reduces grid transmission capacity.
Just when we need more electricity, it is harder and more expensive to generate and transmit.
TOU rates allow utilities to charge for higher cost energy when that energy is being used, and to charge less when it is easier and less expensive to supply.
The peak problem is increasing
In California, peak requirements are increasing faster than overall electricity demand. Load factors (average demand compared to peak demand) are declining as a result. More and more infrastructure is required to satisfy less and less baseload demand.
Today’s generation and transmission mix will not satisfy tomorrow’s demand needs. Proportionally more peaking infrastructure is required.
The most recent version of the ten year California Energy Demand Forecast, for example, illustrates that load factors are expected to decline from 2010 through 2020. Declining load factor is driven primarily by air conditioning requirements, but is also heightened, surprisingly, by energy efficiency solutions.
The general decline in the load factor over the last 20 years indicates a greater proportion of homes and businesses with central air conditioning. This trend is projected to continue over the forecast period. Energy efficiency measures, such as more efficient lighting, can also contribute to the declining load factor by reducing overall energy use while having an insignificant effect on peak demand.
A 2010 University of California Berkeley study revealed that in spite of increased energy efficiency building standards, new buildings consume more electricity than older buildings. “As new buildings are added, aggregate temperature response (more electricity demand) is predicted to increase.”
Peak demand from Residential consumers in California is growing faster than any other sector.
Solar provides a win-win
Where peak power supply challenges other generation sources, however, it is a bonus for solar PV generation and a benefit for the utilities. If the PV system is located close to the peak load demand, PV generation also reduces the strains of peak demands on the transmission and distribution grid.
Can Renewables Standards help?
California’s Renewables Portfolios Standard (RPS) is about to increase from 20% to 33%. Residential installations already represent almost half the California PV market. Southern California Edison (SCE) leads the other major investor owned utilities, with 19.4% of its 2010 retail electricity sales from renewable power.
Given the escalating peak demand from the Residential sector, it is instructive to model what impact 10% PV-based generation would have on Residential load profiles.
The most recent California Energy Demand Forecast already includes as much as 810 MW of PV generation against peak demand by 2020. Peak demand, however, is far in excess of this amount of PV generation.
If SCE, for example, were to prioritize PV for 10% of its RPS requirements, the effective peak requirements could be reduced by more than 30% for Residential customers alone.
Putting PV systems on rooftops can result in a major impact on the system needs to provide and manage peak electricity demand.
4 Responses to “Time of Use Rates Favor Solar PV”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
- Lux Summit Forecasts a Post Subsidy Solar PV Industry | d-bits - [...] will drive growth in place of subsidies? Sullivan stated that, “we see Time-of-Use Pricing as the number one driver…
- When Solar PV is Less Expensive than Cheap Hydro | d-bits - [...] demand. In North American jurisdictions, such as California, it is not unusual for peak demand to grow faster than…
- When Solar PV is Less Expensive than Cheap Hydro | Home Energy Solutions - [...] [...]
- How smart meters help get more solar energy on the grid | eMeter - [...] helpful are time-of-use prices? One industry study found that such prices reduce the payback period for photovoltaic systems by…
Hello,
Could you please provide more information on the underlying report? (title, author, link, etc)
Thanks!
The underlying report was prepared by D+A for a client.
If there is something specific that you are interested in, if it was covered, I will do my best to provide it. If it wasn’t covered, but is related, we may look at it in the future.
There is another excellent report, that was completed by Darghouth, Barbose, and Wiser at Lawrence Berkeley labs a year ago that looks at a number of similar factors. This is available at:
The Impact of Rate Design and Net Metering on the Bill Savings from Distributed PV for Residential Customers in California
http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/emp/reports/lbnl-3276e.pdf
Richard Perez at ASRC in Albany has also done some excellent modelling of the impact of PV on peak, including the impact of dispersion factor (i.e. the dispersed nature of distributed generation).
http://www.asrc.cestm.albany.edu/perez/directory/ResourceAssessment.html
Regards, David
My partner and i have been researching into photo voltaic energy for just about a yr and as a consequence my spouse and i conclusively made the commitment based upon on the blend of governtment incentive plans in addition to genuinely cost effective financing. My spouse and i have actually really been looking into solar power for approximately a year and then my spouse and i eventually made the decision primarily based upon the blend of governtment incentive plans in addition to very cost efficient credit. I genuinely could not comprehend precisely how cheap the program was and therefore we already have been another solar powered home for about a calendar month and almost everything appears as though it all is in fact working out great. We can also literally get pleasure from exactly how much power our organization aer conserving each and every day of the week and it is rather remarkable. I alway thought that solar energy was promoted because of a ton of hoopla however , I will certainly inform you the fact that it is undoubtedly the authentic deal. My spouse and i wish my partner and i had implemented it many years ago.
Properly factoring in TOU into your initial solar panel design can decrease your system size because of the extra savings. So you want to make sure you have just enough solar power to get your bill close to a zero, but not lower than that.